A few months ago, I share the preprint of a study where we discuss the missing link between spatial accessibility and spatial interaction models. The paper has now been published, and the manuscript became more concise and better thanks to peer-review, which is not always the case lol.

• Soukhov, A., Pereira, R. H., Higgins, C. D., & Páez, A. (2025). A family of accessibility measures derived from spatial interaction principles. PloS one, 20(11), e0335951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335951

Abstract:

Transportation planning has long prioritized the efficiency of movement. However, the concept of accessibility represents a more comprehensive evolution, shifting focus from movement (i.e., trips) to the potential to spatially interact with desired destinations. Despite growing recognition of accessibility-based planning approaches, the concept remains fragmented, with inconsistent definitions and unclear interpretations. To this end, this paper makes a methodological contribution by specifying a family of accessibility measures that are grounded in the shared ‘gravity-based’ theoretical roots of spatial interaction models, particularly their balancing factors. From this foundation, we outline four members of the family: the ‘unconstrained’ measure (i.e., Hansen-type accessibility), the ‘total-constrained’ measure (i.e., a constrained version of the Hansen-type accessibility), the ‘singly-constrained’ measure (i.e., related to the popular two-step floating catchment approach – 2SFCA), and the ‘doubly-constrained’ measure representing realized access (i.e., equal to the doubly-constrained spatial interaction model). These measures can be interpreted as either the number of accessible opportunities or accessible population (i.e., market potential). A toy example illustrates how they produce interpretable unit-based values, offering a clearer and more coherent basis for accessibility analysis.